workingmyprogram wrote on 21 Mar 2018 21:39:
Firstly, you're making this personal and you're making assumptions about Cordnoy.
Look, I think this topic is hitting on a very sensitive chord for me. I never really shared with anyone how deceiving and horrible it feels to have people you trust, such as your own sponsor, challenge and ridicule your religious beliefs and then try and replace yours with their own. Looking back, it's clear to me that what I experienced was totally unethical and I equate it with a form of abuse (at the very least a huge transgression of boundaries). So when I come on here to share my experience and someone suggests that I could be making up stories, or tries to minimize my experience, it's actually very hurtful. I'm not trying to be a drama queen, but I feel like it's my responsibility to prevent what happened to me from happening to others. After The Meadows, I seriously considered giving up Yiddishkeit completely. I was even listening to Christian music for Gd's sake. This was due to all the anti Jewish messages I received. But then again, I made myself a target. They saw I was vulnerable, I was asking questions, and they decided to go for it. I will be the first to admit that others may have had different experiences there. And I'm sure a persons experience with SA depends a lot on where they go to meetings. I started meetings in Isreal 10 years ago and never had the "missionary" issues, although the underlying Christian view point of lust was still being promoted of course. Once I got back to America and the meetings were mostly goyim, this is when it started. But I'll admit it's probably not the norm and hasn't been a constant issue for me, nor am I trying to portray it as one. However, even once is too much. To call these people "missionaries" is to inaccurately describe what they do. These are NOT professional people out to get us, who incorporate every conversation with their message. These are regular people in the meetings, who genuinely care about us, become close to us, and then after a while (sometimes even months) gently bring up how believing in the J man works for them. In my experience, once they bring it up once and they see you don't argue with them, this invites them to bring it up again and again. This is very subtle and most people wouldn't be able to label these guys as missionaries because it's so subtle. The point is, SA was not started by Jews, and therefore we can't control the message nor the membership. We need live groups for Jews that promote a Jewish perspective of how to deal with this struggle and that is only open to frum yidden who share our beliefs and sensitivities.
I like this post, although I disagree with the endin'. (I don't know if you were referrin' to me in the beginnin', but I'd just like to repeat that I never suggested that you made up the story; rather that it's an outlier.)
And that is why I disagree with the end. You say a few times, they do this, or they act subtly, etc. That is where our disagreement lies. I do not think that the pattern is there. And that is because of all the accumulative (sp) experiences of the people here. And that is why I don't think there needs to be that danger sign before sendin' someone to SA.
And sir, we can argue and have different opinions; I respect that.
Most of the followin' I will be repeatin' from Dov, but I might not be completely accurate, for He is much deeper than me, as I am extremely superficial in my understandin'.
Roy k. was one of SA's starters and he had religious tendencies; they came out towards the end and that is why he was booted out. SA is the most irreligious organization out there. There are no leaders and there is no agenda, other than livin' a life of recovery - bein' free from our tendencies. (There is a huge machlokes goin' on in an email thread if it is "victory over," or "freedom from," but I will leave that to the philosophers and chachamim.) Again, I am not bein' dismissive of your experience, and by the way, I feel terrible about it that you went thru that, but I don't think at all that this is a concern. Why? Because of all the years of talkin' to experts and rabbanim and askanim and people includin' myself who consistently went to meetings.
And regardin' your last point, that obviously is the impetus for GYE to start PA (or at least one of the reasons). But, I will say somethin' that I have written about many times before here on the forum and in emails and on the phone (and that doesn't make it right), and that is that I have spoken to many fellows who go to SA meetings in Lakewood and Brooklyn, consistin' mainly of frum yidden, and after attendin' many times and obtainin' a (frum) sponsor, you know what happens? They stop goin' to minyan. They learn less. Mitzvos take a back seat, until some start with the calls on Shabbos, for its pikuach nefesh. I have spoken to Dov and others about this, and while they concurred with me that I am not entirely off base, they were not add concerned as me. I'd like for there to be an asterisk by frum SA meetings that they should be on guard.
We can talk about it here; recovery is a very intense issue....emotions get riled up. Let's discuss calmly.
You don't like SA meetin's with gentiles; I don't like them with Jews.
Warning: Spoiler!Let's go to a gentlemen's club and discuss further.
God speed!