Aryeh821 wrote on 11 Jul 2017 04:06:
bear wrote on 10 Jul 2017 07:41:
Hey whats up.
My rebbe in high school showed me a teshuva from Rav Moshe Fienstein that it is assur.
Also maybe read Dear Bachur:
guardyoureyes.com/ebooks/item/dear-bachur?category_id=149
I think he brings the teshuva and talks about talking to girls in general.
You can use this to your advantage.if you mess up and your mom wants to speak to you just tell her "I don't talk to girls".
Ya i know super corny but its 3:41 am
good luck
do you know where the tshuvah is
plus reb dovid orlofsky and reb menashe bleiwiess both have good shuirim on this although i prefer the latter
Here is part of dear bachur e-book (page 14) that mentions the teshuva, and says where it is from. Also where can i find the two shiurim you mentioned? Thanks
here is the dear bachur part:
This
halachah is expressed in Mesechta Sanhedrin (75a) where the the Gemora states
the following:
"Rav Yehudah said in the name of Rav: There was as incident of a
certain man who put his eyes on a particular woman and became
obsessed with lovesickness. They came and asked the doctors, who said
that there is no hope for him until that woman has relations with him.
The Chachomim said, 'Let him die, but let her not have relations with
him.' They suggested, "Let her stand in front of him while undressed (to
perhaps appease his passion)." The Chachomim said, "Let him die, but let
her not stand in front of him undressed." They suggested again, "Let her
converse with him from behind a fence." The Chachomim said, "Let him
die, but let her not converse with him from behind a fence." That is the
end of the story. Then the Gemora brings a dispute as to the status of
this woman. One opinion is that she was a married woman. The second
opinion is that she was a single woman. The Gemora asks: If she was
married, we understand why he has to die rather than transgress, but if
she was unmarried, why does he need to die to avoid this transgression?
The Gemora offers two answers. Either to avoid the disgrace of the
family we will not let her have illicit relations with him, or else because
it could cause a breech in arayos, that other people will pretend that
they, too, are in danger of dying because of lovesickness.
It is important for us to understand the implications of this passage in
the Gemora. There is a vast difference whether this woman was married or
not. The prohibition to have relations with a married woman is giluy arayos.
There the halacha of yaiharag v'al ya'avor applies. If she was unmarried and
not a nidah, there would be an issur Torah to have relations, but it would not
fall under the category of giluy arayos. That is why the Gemora originally
said that it is understandable that he should have to give his life only if she
was married, because it is a case of arayos. If not, however, then the halacha
of yaiharag v'al ya'avor should not apply.
From this passage we see that not only actual relations, (giluy arayos),
require a person to give his life, but even lesser issurim such as those
suggested by the doctors, (aviz'reihu d'giluy arayos), require a person to give
his life.
Creating a platonic (friendly) relationship
Based on this Gemora, Hagaon R' Moshe Feinstein, zt"l paskened that it is
forbidden by the negative commandment of lo sikr'vu to have even a "friendly"
relationship between a boy and a girl. Some people are under the mistaken
impression that there is nothing actually wrong with having a "friend" of the
opposite gender. They think that as long as they are not alone (yichud) and don't
transgress any issurim, such as physical contact, there is nothing halachically
improper. Of course they will admit that for people on a higher madreiga it would
be better to refrain, but, they think, not everyone can be so holy. This issue is
discussed in a teshuva in sefer Igros Moshe [Even Ha'ezer part 4 teshuva # 60]. Rav
Moshe z'tl was asked about a youngster who had a girlfriend, and claimed that
since they were never alone in a secluded place there was nothing halachically
wrong. The bachur said that he was not interested in hearing any mussar, but only
strict halacha. Rav Feinstein proved from the above passage in the Gemora (and
from the accompanying rishonim) that anything which could bring to affection is
assur because of lo sikr'vu, including conversations which are for the purpose of
creating a relationship. That is why the Chachomim said that he would have to
give his life rather than have an intimate conversation from opposite sides of a
fence.