guardureyes wrote on 20 Nov 2010 22:09:
Look, if you grew up in mud and live in mud, you won't notice a stain on your filthy shirt. But if you are clean and wear white clothes... you'll notice any stain.
Once you get splashed with a little mud on a white shirt, you say, "what the heck, the shirt's already dirty, I may as well roll in the mud!!".... That's why some frum guys spiral down so fast....
Also, as they say in SA, it's a progressive disease, and as we distance ourselves from it, the disease continues to progress and we get ever more sensitive.... As Dov has written many times, he is much more sensitive today than he was when he first got sober 13 years ago. The good news is that he doesn't "test" his sensitivity any more. He has internalized that it's poison for him.
There seems indeed to be some connection between "distancing ourselves" and "sensitivity". But it makes perfect sense.
So "yes", the more sheltered are perhaps more "at risk". But that's like saying, "the spotlessly clean people are more at risk for getting dirty". Obviously. :o
Guard
The question was “Are children who grow up in a sheltered frum environment More likely to have P & M problems. Are you really suggesting that a child who is raised in a home without a TV, who doesn’t watch movies, or have access to trashy magazines is "More likely" to have a problem?
I grant you that he (or she) may have a problem, certainly the children with raging out of control hormones (Except I don’t think those children will do any better with allowed exposure to this either).
I grant you sheltering your children doesn’t guarantee you any amount of success in raising them pure.
But “More likely”? That’s ludicrous!
I guess you agree with the people who say that they expose their children to everything so that they can make “informed choices”