Well said!!
strugglingandstrivngBT wrote on 11 Jan 2012 14:25:
...my oppinion is most Jews who think they are addicted to porn are not. clinical addiction ruins lives not because the bar is set so high, but because the indivdiual has sank so low..............now, the fact that we know its wrong and continue to use to cover up emotional failings means that an addictive model fits our cases, but it does not mean we are an addict. Now, there are definitely some on here that are addicts, and I dont mean to diagnose anyone but myself. but I cant without self deception admit I am a full blown addict. I have a spiritual and emotional problem that exasperates yet is caused by a psychiatric disorder that HAS been diagnosed and I do admit to (ocd). this is not about denial, its about truth. sorry if this offends or upsets anyone.
Well, you certainly have not offended
me, for I agree with you wholeheartedly and have said as much many times on this forum. I believe that most of the frum guys who like looking at porn and masturbating enough to actually
do it, are not addicts the way I experience addiction, even though they have a compulsion to lust in some way.
The line that divides it for most people I meet seems to be whether our behavior - or obsessions - are interrupting our lives and yet we cannot stop, even though it messes things up. By "cannot stop" I mean that we have exhausted all avenues, yet are still in the toilet. Sure, one could say that "you should have tried
harder!" - but we have not, and apparently
will not. All evidence points to a continuation (till it becomes physically impossible due to old age, etc.).
Another litmus test may be this: What is fair to the family? How long (in years) is it right to "keep plugging away fighting the good fight"? How many sacred bonds and trusts must be violated for a wife to simply leave her husband? This is an individual thing, of course, not Torah- or doctor-mandated. And how much should the
children be made to suffer not
really having a father (or mother)? How long do they have to be duped in this way?
And if it is a bochur (or bachurah), then the question may be: How many years do they want to futz around giving a shot to all the therapists, medications (I tried them both), and well-meaning rabbonim? Isn't it important to try safe, tried and proven extreme measures to get their life on a different footing
before the relative end of marriageable (or child-bearing) years? Nu?
Sure, we all want to get
'better' - I wanted to get better badly for 15-20 years while really trying to be good (the best) in yeshivah, doing some work in kiruv, raising a family.... but I experienced the big difference in the rather sudden arrival of
my need to stop, though I obviously had to admit that I could not quit. No rebbi would have had a clue about what to tell me to do, then. And they all
know it - except for the ones who are addicts in recovery themselves...
How many times must one fail and get worse and worse till he finally admits that he is a loser at this thing?
Should we bemoan the fact that there are many here who get brainwashed into thinking they are adicts, while they are not? I think so. But who will decide what crosses that line? Not me!
But
spreading the message is not the same as
shoving the program down peoples' throats. For example, many have read my posts and accused me of the shoving - yet I have
never told anyone that they are or are not an addict.
AA puts it this way (more or less):
"Our program is based on attraction rather than
promotion." It does not work to argue with the poor choices of others (like Avraham Avinu did - whose initials ironically were AA
- but freely shares the truth with anyone who reaches for it (like Noach) - and lets live (or die) all those who do not, even if they are suferring. Kol mi sh'ein bo deyah, assur lerachem olov, Chaza"l tell us. I, and every addict I know,
had to come into recovery 'willingly' - we all had to be forced by our own hands - ein hadovor tolui ella bee. We needed to
need to escape from ourselves - from our sickness. Till we had no other option but to stop - but could not - we were not really ready to get this program yet.
So we owe our
acting out the greatest thanks for forcing us into recovery, rather than our yiddishket. As long as it is a
madreigo that we are after, we will not really come into the door. Witness so many of the guys
still using fake names, being so 'shockingly honest' about all their deep and embarrassing secrets - yet safely still secret behind a fake name and forever faceless. Unable to meet anothert addict or they'll die...?
Sure, we have to start somewhere...many are not ready to meet face to face with another sick person. But Actions speak much louder than words, and those who wonder why they are still out of control and yet are still unwilling to pay any real price for getting better....have no one to blame but their lack of enough pain. When it hurts enough, they'll have to give it up and open up for real. Then there is recovery for anyone who wants it, I believe.
On the other hand,
GYE is not a 'recovery program' in the sense of AA or SA, at all. It
is based on promotion, and violates most of the traditions of AA. And that's great, I think, because it is
not just for addicts, and
says so...usually. But may it be Hashem's Will that here on the forum, we refrain from promoting the diagnosis of
others.
******************
There is still one little point I don't really agree with in the above:
By secular standards I am far from addicted to porn, I just have a very high expectation for myself.
I have met many, many goyim who are in SA
and the 'worst' compulsion they have ever had is to look at porn and have sex with themselves (masturbation). Some have not even been that compulsive about the masturbation - and they came to recovery because their lives were becoming unmanageable and totally unncceptable to them. And they are not even
religious goyim.
I have learned over and over that "The Media" does not really determine
which compulsive use of lust is mentally 'safe' and 'OK' or 'normal' for men and women. What you imply here, I feel, is based on a sense of Jewish moral supremacy that may be true - but is completely irrelevant, here.
The powerlessness and unmanageability that the frum yiddin find in their addiction is exactly the same as that of the goyim they meet. Only in the way they
paint it and
label it, is there a difference.
And conversely, we both know that there are plenty of Jewish men who have looked at porn for pleasure, have even had affairs,
and even used prostitutes -who are certainly
not addicts. They do
not need 12 step recovery. They need Teshuvah. Hashem loves them as He does us addicts, and will accept his Teshuvah. They do not have a mental illness, but simply like the way it makes them feel and have been nichshol once or twice. The first step, as I experience it, has nothing to do with that.
This point is obvious to me. Judging an addiction by the 'severity' of the behavior is missing the point completely.
It might be nice to read "The Doctor's Opinion" in the very beginning of the book, "Alcohilics Anonymous", on this idea.
It could be argued that a frum man who uses lust behaviors is closer to being an addict because more is acceptable in the goyishe world. But I prefer to believe that it is only covered up better in the goyishe world. Compulsive use of sex and lust as a drug bites the goyim in the end as hard as it bites us. There is no easy escape behind 'societal norms', if it really is a progressive, chronic problem for the person.