In control BSD wrote on 23 Oct 2011 21:55:
....but what is really hard is that with any other addiction, going cold turkey is most effective, however with this addiction, we are permitted and even have a mitsvah to be with our wife. not exactly cold turkey is it?! i guess one needs to make a clear distinction and acknowledge the difference between smut or lust and the purity that a marriage is supposed to be, and then go cold turkey on the smut. food for thought . . . .
what do you think?....
This question comes up a lot. I'm reposting here something I wrote on another thread in September regarding this. It's just my own thoughts:
It's no wonder we lust addicts have difficulty with this one. We equate sex with lust. After all, it's the same physical pleasure, the same physical end result. So isn't sex with my wife lust? Won't it perpetuate the addiction?
We addicts don't really know what mitzvas onah ("making love?") is supposed to be like or about. I'm no different, so I really can't help. But I do know, at least intellectually, that it has to do with the setting, the emotional content, and the purpose.
The setting: Am I with my life partner or am I alone, or with someone else? I think we can all see a difference here.
The emotional content: Am I feeling love for my wife and using this encounter to further that feeling, to get even closer, to bond and become as one? Or am I focused on just having a good time getting and giving physical pleasure (fooling around).
The purpose: Am I just looking for relief because I've been lusting all day and if I don't do it with her you know what will happen? or, Purpose? What purpose? I just want it! Can't I just have what I want? What I neeeed? I'll even give her what she needs! Relief of a basic animal urge, as opposed to doing it because it's a mitzva, to have children, to give my wife what I am obligated to.
If the kavanos are correct, and arousal time is limited to the encounter itself, that's not lust!
Can't relate? No prob. Try this:
Happiness and various pleasures trigger the release of the neurotransmitter dopamine in certain areas of the brain, and when this chemical binds to its target receptors, we experience pleasure -- a sense of elation and well-being. We can take opiates (heroin, morphine, oxycontin) or other drugs that will bind to these same receptors, bypassing the need to have the actual pleasurable experience, and just feel that same sense of elation and well-being (intensified). It's addictive. And it requires ever escalating doses of drug to achieve the same effect (for us, kinkier fantasies and images, more dangerous liaisons).
So now our drug addict decides to recover. He abstains from the drug. Any small dose would cause him to relapse. BUT WHAT ABOUT REAL HAPPINESS, LIFE'S REAL PLEASURES? Don't they act on the very same part of the brain as the drug?
Now no one's going to say our addict shouldn't experience true happiness because it might cause him to relapse into drug taking. Same with sex. There's different ways to get this elaborate system fired up -- with gazing, looking at stills, movies, fantasizing, self-stimulation. Or in the appropriate setting discussed above. They may both have a final common pathway, but whether it's the drug or not is all in the approach.