ZemirosShabbos wrote on 27 Jan 2011 19:38:
RisingUp wrote on 27 Jan 2011 19:30:
The experience that one gets when he can write something and watch as other people comment on what he has to say, in a public forum no less, is a feeder to the very powerful ego. It can be addictive.
i agree 100%
but there seems to be a deep-based human instinct to interact, socialize and share thoughts and feelings. if it is done with 'live' people or on an online forum the same obsession can be developed, needing to interact constantly. is the online version more of a problem?
The basis for the false reasoning that when we get married these problems (lusting) will go away lies within this conundrum. The need to interact is at its basic level, a wholly healthy action. What one with this addiction has done is taken the interactiveness out of relationships and replaced it with activeness (sans the "inter..). By acting out and fulfilling his short term wants the addict has transferred his need to
interact to a need to keep this "wants" of his fulfilled. Thus his "wants"have become his needs and his needs no longer include the aforementioned "
interactiveness". In our case the "wants" are lusting, whereas the original "needs" were love between one and their spouse. Therefore the love between a spouse and an addict does not take the place of the addicts "wants" and henceforth the addict does not
magically heal when he gets married.
The same applies in our case although it must be applied differently. When one posts his comments online other people see it and comment based upon the way they feel and the way they feel other people will react to what they say. So far not very different from an in-person conversation. What then takes place is the difference that you present. A person in a live conversation is limited to his audience and as such will tailor his opinion to the few people that he is interacting with. This is comparable to the interaction between the husband and wife who have only each other. Conversely, the addict chooses his fix exactly according to what gives him his most "fulfilling" high. This is what occurs online, where the nature of the comments one makes does not have to take into account what any one small group of people will think of him. Think about what would be the case if online interaction was limited to cross-interaction by a limit of 3 people. There would very doubtfully be any addiction to such forums. Now lets connect the beginning and end and we notice that when one posts online he fulfills his "wants" to gain a positive reaction to his comments but disregards his "needs" to tailor his comments to the crowd that he is speaking to. By tailoring his needs to those that are around him he would be creating a wholly positive relationship; but by disregarding this need he is fulfilling it with the short term "wants" that he gains by not having to tailor his comments.
Once again, this is my own educated opinion, and I encourage debate.