Kedusha wrote on 14 Nov 2010 04:11:
1.) Where there is no danger to life, but the person is Nafal l'Mishkav ("incapacitated"), it is permitted for a Jew to perform [Melacha].
[...] A person who cannot function normally because of a psychological disorder, such as depression or anxiety, is also considered to be incapacitated [...] I think it’s reasonable to categorize someone in recovery from a sex/lust addiction [...] as a person who cannot function normally [...] because, were he to relapse [...] his ability to function normally may be seriously compromised [...]
Sorry, Kedusha, I'm still not convinced. Let's take any of the other 12-step addictions. If that OA/Soveya addict is about to grab some kugel that might cause a heart attack, it's worth a call?? If the AA member decides a shalom zochor is important enough for just one drink, it's worth a call?? Yes, they can't pull together proper bechira, but it's not outside the realm of normal FUNCTIONING.
I always understood "normal functioning" to be like the medical term of "independent activities of daily living." So if the guy can put his pants on in the morning, and his only problem is keeping those hands out of those pants >, I have my doubts that the halachic hurdles are met. He's not in danger from not functioning, but only in danger of not functioning al pi halacha. Which doesn't convince me.
But, as you say, this is a sheileh for poskim and not a poll for addicts. I'd only add that the sheileh must be presented fully, honestly, and with integrity. Which means, it da**ed well better be presented before the moment before the moment of no return. Which ones of us have the
to do that?!