strugglingandstrivngBT wrote on 08 Oct 2010 19:37:
The lust is definitely more of a problem, but there is a component of wanting the gratification of M...I think the latter was what I was referring to in regard to natural sex. Often once the craving starts, the lust follows and makes it worse. And often the swings come intense until I cave. If I cave with M.. I am set in both for about a month (with a day of feeling really bad), and if I cave to lust I almost always cave to M soon after. If I beat both, the craving for m doesn't go away. that's my frustration. kitzer: lust is an absolute problem; I'm simultaneously a normal young adult with desires that make my issues worse.
So I agree with what you said, but add those details. I'm curious as to what your opinion is now.
GOOD SHABBOS ALL!!!! may we have true rest from our addictions and stress this week and start off (technically keep starting off) chesvan right!!!
Wow. You brought up a lot here. First, and quite annoyingly, I want to reiterate that I do
not equate having a desire for lust and sex with 'addiction'. I believe that probably most of the men and women out there who struggle with occasional desires of this nature are not addicts, but just
normal. Even in the context of yiddishkeit, where there is no room whatsoever for expression of inappropriate sexuality, I see no reason whatever to throw the label 'addiction' at it. Many others feel otherwise, I know, and I believe that (in their case) 'addiction' may be a big red herring for them. Finally, I feel that participation of non-addicts waters down the program for everyone because a non-addict is not personally desperate. It is all philosophical rather than practical. I believe he doesn't really
personally need a G-d for his problem.
He may see it as a
religious problem - in other words,
G-d's problem with
him - but not a personal problem of his own. And that is where I believe
addiction, 12 steps recovery, and Derech Eretz departs from
'frustration with youthful desire', the YH, and Torah. This was all just
my little opinion - not '
the Truth'. There - I have said my peace.
Here is an interesting tidbit for you: In SA, we define masturbation 100% as sex. It is defined as: sex with yourself. This is neither semantics nor a moshol, but what it really
is. For me, that changes the playing field a bit.
All that having been said, you describe the cyclical experience that Roy described in his White Book in the chapter
before the steps, called "Step Zero". You may enjoy it (maybe you have seen it already...).
There is a beautiful line in the White Book about what you said (quite well) above. It is in a short intro piece titled, "The Problem", and probably 'darshened' a bit more in the Step Zero chapter, and goes like this: "the only way we knew to be free of it was
to do it." I have always found it very profound and also helpful when I have a desire. When I get a stupid idea like "Yep, following her or getting a better look at that would
really help me out" and it doesn't just go-away after I say no (which proves to me that my body really believes that it is good for me, in fact, that my body innocently and honestly believes that
I need it; exactly like I am convinced - by my
stomach - that I need food when I am starving), I ask Hashem to help me remember that there will always be yet another stupid lust image/fantasy/pretty lust object out there later, so 'getting over' my current desire by 'doing it' will not do me any good, at all - the exact same feeling that
I must have this will return. Nothing will have changed at all. 'Hanging on' just for today while doing nothing to learn tools to get free of lust is nothing but a bastardization and poor usage of the old adage, 'One Day at a Time". Spare me of
that fate, please. I want to surrender lust one day at a time, not hold my breath and pretend I am overcoming it.
Did I address your points in a useful way?