wilnevergiveup wrote on 06 Apr 2022 11:10:
I benefit from everyone on this site. I don't believe there is a right or wrong way to do anything, and I am all for trying new things.
If someone does decide to post about something in a way that it comes across as either guaranteed, either that it works, or that it doesn't, know that it will rub people the wrong way. Being that we are all products of our experiences, we all share different views based on what we have tried. There is no one way and anyone who posts a "Try it and you will see the difference" method, it just reeks of emptiness. If it works for you, say that, if you are trying something new, say that.
Here are some of the things that come to mind. "Easy Peasy" (however it's spelled) was being promoted as the Messiah of porn addiction. If it would have been promoted here as an idea to try it may have been better received. the same goes for the "Self Talk" thread. Self talk is something that works, but not the way it was promoted in that thread. It's a tool, not a method. I am sure that is what the posters there meant, but it was promoted as "try it and you will see" to which I thought, "Okay, maybe you try it and let me know first".
My point is that threads like this one, or the other ones are perfectly fine but be prepared to defend your position. If you cannot defend your position and the only thing you do is challenge another contribution to this site, that speaks pretty poorly on what you are trying to promote.
For your information, @Trouble has helped me a lot. Not just his whim, but I find his presence bringing a lot of empathy. From what I gather, he has been through it all, and know batter than anyone what works and what doesn't. You gotta have respect for someone who is here for that long, and still stays connected to the chevra here. I mean, you guys are a contradiction, you are booting someone for not being successful in a thread that is promoting not to judge yourself by your successes. Gosh!
I don't think @Trouble needs my help, that is not my intention. I guess I just want you guys to stand up to the plate when you are being challenged.
I agree with everything written here. I did not mean to present self-talk as a method that for sure works for everyone or as a replacement for anything anyone else is doing. It was meant as something that does work a nice percent of the time (surely far from 100%) for other matters (addictive behaviors, low self-esteem, depression, getting better at basketball, etc.), and I started an experiment to see how well it would help people after trying it for 90 days, in an easier way that would make it actually more likely that they would do the self-talk for 90 days. I'm not sure where I came off otherwise, but I was worried that perhaps someone would take this or any other mistaken idea, so I invited "discussion." But instead of discussion, I was met with sarcastic fervor from people who never tried self-talk or read about whether it is effective or not. No one bothered asking if I can post a link to a study about whether it actually works for anything or not. Because the people who posted were just interested in making fun of anything they see, rather than actually discussing the topic.
(If you feel Shtarkandemotional wrote differently, 1. He's not me. 2. He is a very exuberant person and perhaps he overstated things mistakenly. A nice normal non-threatening conversation would have corrected any mis-impressions he gave off.)
The one relevant topic that did come up, about saying things that you don't believe to be true, yielded a nice discussion. Though the poster himself also could not help himself and had to mention his "stance" in a way that accused us of saying things in self-talk that we don't believe in and of lying to ourselves, without 1) actually discussing it with us, and 2) without actually reading the thread. He just heard about the thread and had someone post his definite truth on it.
I don't think these are ways to have a productive discussion.
As an aside, I think the thread did its job. We have a few people trying self-talk, and if they are willing to report their results after 90 days, I will let everyone know how it went. Of course, 5 people's results will not be a proven track record of anything. But it will provide some food for thought.
Regarding Trouble, I don't mean to make any fun. I am genuinely interested in hearing what he has to say, on a separate thread in What Works for Me. (I pledge not to pop in and mock what he says with sarcastic banter.) I have a lot of respect for Trouble. I didn't mean to make fun. Though I do wish he would presenting things on other people's threads in a more refined way.
I'm asking anyone who, like me, genuinely wants to hear Trouble's methods and wants him to open a thread about it in What Works for Me, to please click the Thank You button to show him that you want it.